upload here
Andrew Cooper
What did he study?
He studies how companies should consider prioritizing social impact over profit.
Why is it interesting for a company?
Andrew believes that ethical leadership can increase employee engagement, strengthen consumer trust and, especially, ensure long-term sustainability.
What did he identify? What is his main result?
He identified that profit-only mentality can be harmful to companies and its consumers. His result is to put in action strategies in order to transform organizations into beacons of trust and social responsibility.
Managerial implication?
Managers should shape their strategies based on social impact alongside the financial performance.
Boundary condition?
This type of leadership is mostly effective when stakeholders value social impact and responsibility. However, in industries where profit is prioritized the ethical leadership can quickly become difficult to implement.
What did he study?
He studies how companies should consider prioritizing social impact over profit.
Why is it interesting for a company?
Andrew believes that ethical leadership can increase employee engagement, strengthen consumer trust and, especially, ensure long-term sustainability.
What did he identify? What is his main result?
He identified that profit-only mentality can be harmful to companies and its consumers. His result is to put in action strategies in order to transform organizations into beacons of trust and social responsibility.
Managerial implication?
Managers should shape their strategies based on social impact alongside the financial performance.
Boundary condition?
This type of leadership is mostly effective when stakeholders value social impact and responsibility. However, in industries where profit is prioritized the ethical leadership can quickly become difficult to implement.
Andrew Cooper
1. What did he study?
Andrew Cooper studies ethical leadership, by showing the way leaders shoul prioritize conscience, social impact, and trust instead of focusing on profit exclusively, and how it benefits to organizations.
2. Why is it interesting for a company?
It’s interesting for a company because companies that adopt ethical leadership gain long-term trust, attract talent and customers. It also lowers the risks linked to disengagement.
3. What did he identify?
He identified the danger of public disengagement when businesses follow outdated profit-only models. He discovers that it harms society but also the companies themselves. So the leaders of the companies have to transform their business models.
4. Managerial implication
Managers should integrate ethics into his strategy. They must evaluate not only financial performance but also social and environmental impacts, social responsibility, and lead with honesty and transparency.
5. Boundary condition
His ideas are more effective if leaders are genuinely committed. Short-term financial pressures, or sceptical shareholders may limit the impact of ethical leadership.
1. What did he study?
Andrew Cooper studies ethical leadership, by showing the way leaders shoul prioritize conscience, social impact, and trust instead of focusing on profit exclusively, and how it benefits to organizations.
2. Why is it interesting for a company?
It’s interesting for a company because companies that adopt ethical leadership gain long-term trust, attract talent and customers. It also lowers the risks linked to disengagement.
3. What did he identify?
He identified the danger of public disengagement when businesses follow outdated profit-only models. He discovers that it harms society but also the companies themselves. So the leaders of the companies have to transform their business models.
4. Managerial implication
Managers should integrate ethics into his strategy. They must evaluate not only financial performance but also social and environmental impacts, social responsibility, and lead with honesty and transparency.
5. Boundary condition
His ideas are more effective if leaders are genuinely committed. Short-term financial pressures, or sceptical shareholders may limit the impact of ethical leadership.
Jaime Llorente Alvarez and Diego Rodriguez
● What did he study?
Andrew Cooper earned a doctorate (PhD) from Emory University. His academic background
laid the foundation for a legal career leading to high-level positions in major corporations.
● Why interesting for a company?
That blend of groundbreaking leadership roles, ethical vision, and cross-industry impact
makes him particularly compelling for modern organizations intent on aligning values with
performance.
● What did he identified? What is his main result?
Public disengagement from businesses and institutions. He argues that outdated,
profit-focused leadership models are eroding trust and risking harm to companies,
consumers, and communities alike.
Call to action: urging leaders and organizations to shift from narrow profit motives to building
trust and social responsibility. He provides actionable strategies to transform organizations
into "beacons of trust and social responsibility
● Managerial Implication
For managers, Cooper’s insights imply that:
● Leadership should prioritize ethical purpose and social impact, not just financial
outcomes.
● Building organizational trust is as important as maximizing profit.
● Implementing ethical frameworks can enhance stakeholder connection, brand
reputation, and long-term sustainability.
● Boundary condition
His approach is particularly relevant for organizations facing public scrutiny or stakeholder
disengagement. Companies entrenched in short-term profit-driven models or operating in
environments resistant to ethical shifts may find these strategies harder to adopt. In such
contexts, the transformation he advocates may be less feasible or require slower, more
incremental adoption.
● What did he study?
Andrew Cooper earned a doctorate (PhD) from Emory University. His academic background
laid the foundation for a legal career leading to high-level positions in major corporations.
● Why interesting for a company?
That blend of groundbreaking leadership roles, ethical vision, and cross-industry impact
makes him particularly compelling for modern organizations intent on aligning values with
performance.
● What did he identified? What is his main result?
Public disengagement from businesses and institutions. He argues that outdated,
profit-focused leadership models are eroding trust and risking harm to companies,
consumers, and communities alike.
Call to action: urging leaders and organizations to shift from narrow profit motives to building
trust and social responsibility. He provides actionable strategies to transform organizations
into "beacons of trust and social responsibility
● Managerial Implication
For managers, Cooper’s insights imply that:
● Leadership should prioritize ethical purpose and social impact, not just financial
outcomes.
● Building organizational trust is as important as maximizing profit.
● Implementing ethical frameworks can enhance stakeholder connection, brand
reputation, and long-term sustainability.
● Boundary condition
His approach is particularly relevant for organizations facing public scrutiny or stakeholder
disengagement. Companies entrenched in short-term profit-driven models or operating in
environments resistant to ethical shifts may find these strategies harder to adopt. In such
contexts, the transformation he advocates may be less feasible or require slower, more
incremental adoption.
Francisco Rojo Agote
What did he study?
Andrew Cooper (Thinkers50) studied law, economics, and political science.
One key idea he develops: leading with conscience—shifting business from profit-only goals to ethical leadership and social responsibility.
Why interesting for a company?
He’s interesting for a company because he links ethics with business success—helping build trust, loyalty, and long-term value.
What did he identified?What is his main result?
Andrew Cooper identified that the profit-only model of leadership is broken, eroding trust in companies and institutions.
His main result: a framework for ethical leadership (“leading with conscience”) that shows how organizations can rebuild trust, strengthen reputation, and create sustainable success by prioritizing social responsibility alongside profit.
Managerial Implication?
The managerial implication of Andrew Cooper’s work is that leaders must integrate ethics into daily decision-making. This means:
-Setting strategies that balance profit with social impact.
-Embedding trust and responsibility into company culture.
-Leading teams with purpose, not just performance metrics.
Boundary condition:
A key boundary condition for Andrew Cooper’s idea is that it works best in contexts where stakeholders (customers, employees, investors, regulators) value trust and social responsibility.
If stakeholders focus only on short-term profit or operate in environments with weak accountability, the impact of “leading with conscience” may be limited
What did he study?
Andrew Cooper (Thinkers50) studied law, economics, and political science.
One key idea he develops: leading with conscience—shifting business from profit-only goals to ethical leadership and social responsibility.
Why interesting for a company?
He’s interesting for a company because he links ethics with business success—helping build trust, loyalty, and long-term value.
What did he identified?What is his main result?
Andrew Cooper identified that the profit-only model of leadership is broken, eroding trust in companies and institutions.
His main result: a framework for ethical leadership (“leading with conscience”) that shows how organizations can rebuild trust, strengthen reputation, and create sustainable success by prioritizing social responsibility alongside profit.
Managerial Implication?
The managerial implication of Andrew Cooper’s work is that leaders must integrate ethics into daily decision-making. This means:
-Setting strategies that balance profit with social impact.
-Embedding trust and responsibility into company culture.
-Leading teams with purpose, not just performance metrics.
Boundary condition:
A key boundary condition for Andrew Cooper’s idea is that it works best in contexts where stakeholders (customers, employees, investors, regulators) value trust and social responsibility.
If stakeholders focus only on short-term profit or operate in environments with weak accountability, the impact of “leading with conscience” may be limited