upload here
What did he study? One concept/idea
Frank Martela studied the role of meaning, happiness, and purpose in influencing both individual performance and organizational success. His work focuses on understanding how these human experiences contribute to well-being at work and how they can be integrated into management practices. Instead of focusing solely on traditional metrics like productivity or profit, Martela explores how fulfilling fundamental human needs—such as autonomy, competence, and relatedness—can lead to a deeper sense of purpose and satisfaction, which in turn boosts motivation and performance.
Why is it interesting for a company?
This idea is highly relevant for companies because it shifts the focus from short-term productivity to sustainable success through employee well-being. Organizations that foster meaning and purpose in the workplace can expect higher levels of engagement, creativity, and loyalty from their employees. When workers find their tasks meaningful, they are more likely to go above and beyond, stay committed during challenges, and contribute positively to the company culture. This approach also helps attract and retain talent, especially among younger generations who prioritize meaningful work over just financial rewards.
What did he identify? What is his main result?
Martela identified that meaning and purpose are fundamental drivers of human motivation and well-being, which are often overlooked in traditional management models. His main result shows that organizations ignoring these psychological needs may suffer from disengagement and burnout, which ultimately harm performance. Conversely, companies that understand and cultivate these elements create environments where employees feel valued and connected to the organizational mission, resulting in better individual and collective outcomes.
Managerial implications?
The key managerial implication of Martela’s work is that leaders should actively foster environments where employees experience meaningfulness in their roles. This involves moving beyond purely transactional management methods and incorporating strategies that support autonomy, competence, and relatedness. For example, managers can :
encourage open communication,
align roles with personal values,
provide growth opportunities,
and recognize contributions not only based on output but also on the purpose behind the work. This holistic approach enhances motivation, well-being, and ultimately, organizational performance.
Boundary condition?
One boundary condition is that the impact of meaning and purpose may vary depending on individual differences and cultural contexts. Not every employee values meaning or happiness in the same way, and some organizational settings might prioritize efficiency or strict processes where fostering purpose is more challenging. Additionally, meaningfulness needs to be authentic—superficial or forced attempts to create purpose may backfire. Therefore, leaders must carefully tailor their approach, ensuring it aligns with the company’s mission and employees’ genuine experiences.
Frank Martela studied the role of meaning, happiness, and purpose in influencing both individual performance and organizational success. His work focuses on understanding how these human experiences contribute to well-being at work and how they can be integrated into management practices. Instead of focusing solely on traditional metrics like productivity or profit, Martela explores how fulfilling fundamental human needs—such as autonomy, competence, and relatedness—can lead to a deeper sense of purpose and satisfaction, which in turn boosts motivation and performance.
Why is it interesting for a company?
This idea is highly relevant for companies because it shifts the focus from short-term productivity to sustainable success through employee well-being. Organizations that foster meaning and purpose in the workplace can expect higher levels of engagement, creativity, and loyalty from their employees. When workers find their tasks meaningful, they are more likely to go above and beyond, stay committed during challenges, and contribute positively to the company culture. This approach also helps attract and retain talent, especially among younger generations who prioritize meaningful work over just financial rewards.
What did he identify? What is his main result?
Martela identified that meaning and purpose are fundamental drivers of human motivation and well-being, which are often overlooked in traditional management models. His main result shows that organizations ignoring these psychological needs may suffer from disengagement and burnout, which ultimately harm performance. Conversely, companies that understand and cultivate these elements create environments where employees feel valued and connected to the organizational mission, resulting in better individual and collective outcomes.
Managerial implications?
The key managerial implication of Martela’s work is that leaders should actively foster environments where employees experience meaningfulness in their roles. This involves moving beyond purely transactional management methods and incorporating strategies that support autonomy, competence, and relatedness. For example, managers can :
encourage open communication,
align roles with personal values,
provide growth opportunities,
and recognize contributions not only based on output but also on the purpose behind the work. This holistic approach enhances motivation, well-being, and ultimately, organizational performance.
Boundary condition?
One boundary condition is that the impact of meaning and purpose may vary depending on individual differences and cultural contexts. Not every employee values meaning or happiness in the same way, and some organizational settings might prioritize efficiency or strict processes where fostering purpose is more challenging. Additionally, meaningfulness needs to be authentic—superficial or forced attempts to create purpose may backfire. Therefore, leaders must carefully tailor their approach, ensuring it aligns with the company’s mission and employees’ genuine experiences.
1. What did he/she study? One concept / idea ?
Frank Martela holds two PhDs: one in organizational research (2012, Aalto University) and another in practical philosophy (2019, University of Helsinki). He is currently an assistant professor in organizational design at Aalto University.
A central idea in Martela’s work is positive contribution as a fundamental dimension of meaningful work. He argues that beyond autonomy or personal fulfillment, the experience of making a positive contribution to others and society is essential for finding meaning at work. He also developed a holistic well-being model consisting of four dimensions: Having (feeling safe), Loving (feeling connected), Doing (meaningful work), and Being (feeling happy).
Why is it interesting for a company?
Positive contribution boosts employee motivation, engagement, and well-being because employees feel their work makes a real difference. This combats alienation and disengagement at work.
The Having-Loving-Doing-Being framework helps companies create a more holistic and sustainable employee well-being environment beyond just salary and benefits.
What did he/she identify? What is his/her main result?
Martela identified contribution as a normative value and a distinct source of meaningful work, separate from autonomy and personal growth. Lack of contribution causes a sense of pointlessness, which is different from powerlessness (lack of control).
He emphasizes the importance of a "guaranteed subjectivity"—meaning the subjective feeling of contribution must be supported by actual, objective contribution.
His Having, Loving, Doing, Being model integrates core human needs to better understand and promote well-being at work.
Managerial implications
Managers should embed social contribution as a key organizational goal, encouraging projects that have visible positive impact.
Companies need to establish ways to validate the real impact of employees’ work, not just their feelings about it.
Use holistic well-being measures based on the four dimensions to design targeted interventions (communication, training, flexibility).
Be cautious of over-engagement, as highly meaningful work can lead to burnout if boundaries aren’t respected.
Boundary conditions
The experience of contribution must be both subjectively felt and objectively demonstrable, and this balance can vary by organizational culture and job type.
There must be a healthy work-life balance, as too much meaning in work without limits can cause exhaustion.
The Having-Loving-Doing-Being model’s effectiveness depends on the organization’s capacity to provide safety, community, personal growth, and emotional satisfaction. Some workplaces may lack these elements initially.
Frank Martela holds two PhDs: one in organizational research (2012, Aalto University) and another in practical philosophy (2019, University of Helsinki). He is currently an assistant professor in organizational design at Aalto University.
A central idea in Martela’s work is positive contribution as a fundamental dimension of meaningful work. He argues that beyond autonomy or personal fulfillment, the experience of making a positive contribution to others and society is essential for finding meaning at work. He also developed a holistic well-being model consisting of four dimensions: Having (feeling safe), Loving (feeling connected), Doing (meaningful work), and Being (feeling happy).
Why is it interesting for a company?
Positive contribution boosts employee motivation, engagement, and well-being because employees feel their work makes a real difference. This combats alienation and disengagement at work.
The Having-Loving-Doing-Being framework helps companies create a more holistic and sustainable employee well-being environment beyond just salary and benefits.
What did he/she identify? What is his/her main result?
Martela identified contribution as a normative value and a distinct source of meaningful work, separate from autonomy and personal growth. Lack of contribution causes a sense of pointlessness, which is different from powerlessness (lack of control).
He emphasizes the importance of a "guaranteed subjectivity"—meaning the subjective feeling of contribution must be supported by actual, objective contribution.
His Having, Loving, Doing, Being model integrates core human needs to better understand and promote well-being at work.
Managerial implications
Managers should embed social contribution as a key organizational goal, encouraging projects that have visible positive impact.
Companies need to establish ways to validate the real impact of employees’ work, not just their feelings about it.
Use holistic well-being measures based on the four dimensions to design targeted interventions (communication, training, flexibility).
Be cautious of over-engagement, as highly meaningful work can lead to burnout if boundaries aren’t respected.
Boundary conditions
The experience of contribution must be both subjectively felt and objectively demonstrable, and this balance can vary by organizational culture and job type.
There must be a healthy work-life balance, as too much meaning in work without limits can cause exhaustion.
The Having-Loving-Doing-Being model’s effectiveness depends on the organization’s capacity to provide safety, community, personal growth, and emotional satisfaction. Some workplaces may lack these elements initially.
• What did he she study? One concept/idea
Frank Martela did research on meaningful work and well-being in companies. The goal is to foster both productivity/performance and deep sense of purpose.
He created a four-dimensional model of well-being at work: Having, Loving, Doing and Being. It means he studied what makes people feel well and motivated at work and therefore identified four needs.
Having: Feeling safe and having basic things (like fair pay and a safe workplace)
Loving: Feeling connected to others (good relationships and a sense of belonging)
Doing: Having meaningful work and chances to learn and grow
Being: Feeling happy, satisfied, and generally good about life
• Why interesting for a company ?
When people needs in each of these four areas are met, they are happier at work and thus work more effectively which is great for the company as it would increase its productivity and performance. In doing so, addressing these needs would keep the teams motivated, cooperative and les likely to leave so it would decrease the employee turnover.
• What did he/she identified ? What his/her main result?
Martela identified that employees’ well being is therefore not about financial ends such as money (wages) or benefits (company’s car, promotions). People needs great relationships, cohesion, find a purpose in what they work for so they live their job experience, be happy to go to work every day (good experience).
• Managerial implication?
Therefore, managers should make sure every employee feels comfortable, safe and are respected (treated fairly): having. They must encourage teamwork and friendly relationships (loving) and give employee a chance to learn and do meaningful tasks (doing. Finally, managers should check in how people feel, not just what they achieve (being) as they could help them improve their working conditions (being), make them feel seen.
• Boundary condition?
This approach works best when leaders are genuinely committed to employee well-being and also when the company or workplace is open to change. For this to work, none area should be ignored but at the same time, it could lead to people feeling over-committed to their work that they find so meaningful. In doing so, they would still burn out.
Moreover, this type of well-being management would be easier to implement in small flat firms rather than large ones.
Frank Martela did research on meaningful work and well-being in companies. The goal is to foster both productivity/performance and deep sense of purpose.
He created a four-dimensional model of well-being at work: Having, Loving, Doing and Being. It means he studied what makes people feel well and motivated at work and therefore identified four needs.
Having: Feeling safe and having basic things (like fair pay and a safe workplace)
Loving: Feeling connected to others (good relationships and a sense of belonging)
Doing: Having meaningful work and chances to learn and grow
Being: Feeling happy, satisfied, and generally good about life
• Why interesting for a company ?
When people needs in each of these four areas are met, they are happier at work and thus work more effectively which is great for the company as it would increase its productivity and performance. In doing so, addressing these needs would keep the teams motivated, cooperative and les likely to leave so it would decrease the employee turnover.
• What did he/she identified ? What his/her main result?
Martela identified that employees’ well being is therefore not about financial ends such as money (wages) or benefits (company’s car, promotions). People needs great relationships, cohesion, find a purpose in what they work for so they live their job experience, be happy to go to work every day (good experience).
• Managerial implication?
Therefore, managers should make sure every employee feels comfortable, safe and are respected (treated fairly): having. They must encourage teamwork and friendly relationships (loving) and give employee a chance to learn and do meaningful tasks (doing. Finally, managers should check in how people feel, not just what they achieve (being) as they could help them improve their working conditions (being), make them feel seen.
• Boundary condition?
This approach works best when leaders are genuinely committed to employee well-being and also when the company or workplace is open to change. For this to work, none area should be ignored but at the same time, it could lead to people feeling over-committed to their work that they find so meaningful. In doing so, they would still burn out.
Moreover, this type of well-being management would be easier to implement in small flat firms rather than large ones.